Skip to content
DatabaseBasketballThe record book, page by pageRead the guides
The record bookCareer leadersEvery draft classHall of FameThe ABA yearsFranchise indexReading a box score
Betting

The Battle for Recognition: The ABA's Fight for Its Place in Basketball History

27 October 2026

When the National Basketball Association (NBA) absorbed four teams from the American Basketball Association (ABA) in 1976, it set off a years-long debate over whether the ABA's statistical and historical records deserved to be counted alongside the NBA's.

That debate remains unsettled to this day, as the NBA, while acknowledging the importance of some ABA records, has refused to formally adopt them into its official history. This official stance, criticized by former ABA players and historians, stands in stark contrast to the informal recognition the NBA has given the ABA in various contexts over the past few decades.

The ABA, founded in 1967, pioneered innovations like the three-point line, the Slam Dunk Contest, and a more free-flowing, entertaining style of play that energized fans and players. In an era when the NBA was seen as staid, the ABA brought a vibrant new energy to basketball.

Sports historians widely regard the ABA as a major professional league in its own right, and the NBA acknowledges that fact when it notes that many of its stars, like Julius Erving, Artis Gilmore, and Billy Cunningham, got their start in the ABA. However, the NBA has systematically refused to formally add ABA statistics and records to its own.

Sidelined Registries

As outlined in recent legal analysis, the NBA continues to formally exclude ABA statistics on its stats pages, asserting that it is exploring options for integrating them. To support its stance, the league has historically pointed to its NBA Register, which tracks each player's year-by-year ABA records, and its NBA Guide, which includes categories acknowledging the ABA since the early 1980s. But these accommodations, while providing a quasi-recognition of the ABA, stop short of absorbing the league's statistical legacy into the NBA's own official totals and records.

Former ABA players and their allies have long fought to have those records formally included. In 1982, a group of ex-ABA players, led by Dan Issel, organized a campaign to seek pension adjustments and statistical recognition. But the NBA blocked those efforts, saying that only NBA achievements should be counted.

Decades later, the NBA continues to maintain its stance. Recent reporting based on comprehensive investigations has confirmed the league's position remains unchanged since the merger settlement.

Partial Recognitions, Pension Contention

While the NBA still refuses to formally integrate ABA statistics into its historical record, it has done a number of things that indicate at least some recognition of the league's importance. For example, in 2022, NBA and the NBA Players' Association agreed to grant payments to 115 former ABA players who had met certain criteria. That move highlighted the ongoing controversy over pension settlements that former ABA players and their families say were never properly honored.

Former ABA players say the league's pension trouble is a separate issue from the debate over whether ABA records should be absorbed into the NBA's own legacy, but it is one that remains personally significant for many ex-ABA stars. The ABA merger and related pension issue remained active in later advocacy efforts by former players.

The history and impact of the ABA has been at the core of a multi-decade debate about the league's historical legacy. The debate over ABA recognition continues to focus on whether the NBA should officially treat the ABA as part of its historical record or as a separate league.

Julius Erving: the Faces and Names

A prominent example in discussions about the ABA is Julius Erving. Erving, who left the ABA for the NBA, still has nearly 12,000 of his career points not counted in the NBA's official totals. Observing that omission, analysts have noted that including Erving's ABA points would eclipse the NBA records of several all-time greats.

While noting the NBA's refusal to formally acknowledge ABA records, observers also acknowledge that the NBA has granted them partial recognition through various official publications. The NBA's career statistical charts typically reference NBA and ABA totals, showing at least implicit recognition of the ABA's contributions to basketball history.